Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite coevaluation computed in two bases

Example

Let V=k2 with standard basis e1,e2, and let k have characteristic ≠2. For the second basis b1=e1+e2, b2=e1−e2 with dual basis b1∗=12(e1∗+e2∗), b2∗=12(e1∗−e2∗), the elements ∑iei⊗ei∗ and ∑jbj⊗bj∗ of V⊗V∗ are equal. Hence the coevaluation coev:k→V⊗V∗ of Finite tensor duality and basis-independent coevaluation is computed by the same element in both bases, and the zigzag identities hold in both.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The field k of characteristic ≠2, the space V=k2 with standard basis e1,e2 and dual basis e1∗,e2∗, and the second ordered basis b1=e1+e2, b2=e1−e2 with dual basis b1∗,b2∗.

[F1]

The tensor product conventions: every element of V⊗V∗ is a finite sum of elementary tensors and the defining relations give bilinearity and c(u⊗v)=(cu)⊗v=u⊗(cv) (Scalars, tensor powers, the empty tensor, opposite algebras and finite sums).

[F2]

The dual family of a basis is characterized by bj∗(bk)=δjk (The dual family (b∗)b∈B associated to a Hamel basis B, defined by b∗(c)=δbc), and a dual family of a finite basis is again a basis, so it is determined by those values (The dual family of a finite basis is a basis of the dual space, with the same dimension).

[F3]

For finite-dimensional V, the element ∑ivi∗⊗vi∈V∗⊗V, equivalently ∑ivi⊗vi∗∈V⊗V∗ under the symmetry, is independent of the ordered basis and equals the coevaluation image of 1; both zigzag identities hold (Finite tensor duality and basis-independent coevaluation).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2algebra

First, b1∗,b2∗ as displayed are the dual basis of b1,b2: using ei∗(ej)=δij one computes b1∗(b1)=12(1+1)=1, b1∗(b2)=12(1−1)=0, b2∗(b1)=12(1−1)=0 and b2∗(b2)=12(1+1)=1, so by the characterization of [F2] the displayed functionals are b1∗,b2∗. Then [F1] gives ∑jbj⊗bj∗=12((e1+e2)⊗(e1∗+e2∗)+(e1−e2)⊗(e1∗−e2∗))=12(2e1⊗e1∗+2e2⊗e2∗)=e1⊗e1∗+e2⊗e2∗, the two cross terms cancelling and the factor 12⋅2=1 being legitimate because char⁡k≠2.

2.1step 1.1F3∎

By step 1.1 the same element of V⊗V∗ is computed by the sum over the standard basis and by the sum over the second basis, which is exactly the basis-independence asserted in [F3]; since [F3] identifies this element with the image of 1 under the coevaluation, the coevaluation is computed by the same element in both bases, and the zigzag identities of [F3] hold for both ordered bases.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources