Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A gauge of a nonbalanced set need not be a seminorm

Statement refuted

An absorbing convex set need not have a seminorm as its gauge.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The convex absorbing set C=(−1,2)⊆R.

[F1]

The gauge is the infimum of positive t for which x∈tC (Minkowski functional of an absorbing set).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

From x∈t(−1,2)⟺−t<x<2t, [F1] gives pC(x)=x/2 for x≥0 and pC(x)=−x for x<0.

2.1step 1.1∎

Hence pC(1)=1/2 while pC(−1)=1, contradicting the required equality pC(−1)=∣−1∣pC(1). The missing hypothesis is balancedness.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources