How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gauges of norm balls and finite-dimensional ellipsoids
Example
For , . For a positive-definite real quadratic form on and , . Both are norms: the first is a positive scalar multiple of the given norm, and the second is the norm induced by the inner product associated with the positive-definite quadratic form .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A radius and a positive-definite quadratic form .
The gauge of an absorbing set is the infimum of its admissible positive dilates (Minkowski functional of an absorbing set).
Verification
exactly when , whose infimum over is .
Likewise exactly when , so the infimum is . Positive definiteness gives zero only at , and the displayed formulas give norm homogeneity and triangle inequality.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis, §5.1 examples (standard reference, not scraped)