Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The heat equation has no finite propagation speed

Statement refuted

The finite-propagation claim for the heat equation: there is a finite speed c≥0 such that for every compactly supported datum g and every t>0 the solution Htg vanishes outside the ct-neighbourhood of supp⁡g, that is, supp⁡(Htg)⊆{x:dist⁡(x,supp⁡g)≤ct}. This fails at every positive time for the indicator of an interval.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n=1, the datum f=1[−1,1], t>0 and x∈R.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the evolution and positivity suppliers below (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The indicator of a measurable set is measurable (An indicator function is measurable exactly when its set is measurable), and supp⁡(f)=[−1,1] for f=1[−1,1].

[F2]

If g∈L1(R) satisfies g≥0 almost everywhere and g≠0, then for every t>0 the everywhere-defined integral Htg(x)=∫RΓ(x−y,t)g(y) dy is strictly positive at every x∈R (Infinite propagation speed for nonnegative heat data).

[F3]

For t>0 the heat kernel is Γ(z,t)=(4πt)−1/2e−z2/(4t)>0 with unit mass, and Ht is the evolution of The heat evolution Ht of initial data (The heat kernel on Rn and its causal extension).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1A1F1givenalgebra

The datum f=1[−1,1] is measurable by [F1], is nonnegative everywhere with f=1 on a set of measure 2, is not the zero class, has ∫R∣f∣=2<∞, hence lies in L1(R), and has compact support [−1,1].

2.1F2F3step 1.1given

Infinite propagation: since f∈L1(R), f≥0 and f≠0, the infinite-propagation corollary [F2] gives Htf(x)>0 at every x∈R and every t>0; consequently the set on which the solution is nonzero is all of R, so supp⁡(Htf)=R for every t>0.

3.1step 2.1givenalgebra

Fix any finite speed c≥0 and any t>0. At x=2+ct one has dist⁡(x,[−1,1])=1+ct>ct, but Htf(x)>0 by step 2.1. Thus the required support inclusion fails for every proposed finite speed.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1given∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 exhibit a nonzero nonnegative compactly supported L1 datum whose heat flow is strictly positive at every point at every positive time, so the support of the solution is the whole line although the support of the datum is [−1,1]; the finite-propagation claim is refuted.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources