How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The heat equation has no finite propagation speed
Statement refuted
The finite-propagation claim for the heat equation: there is a finite speed such that for every compactly supported datum and every the solution vanishes outside the -neighbourhood of , that is, . This fails at every positive time for the indicator of an interval.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , the datum , and .
Countable Choice is the hypothesis carried by the evolution and positivity suppliers below (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The indicator of a measurable set is measurable (An indicator function is measurable exactly when its set is measurable), and for .
If satisfies almost everywhere and , then for every the everywhere-defined integral is strictly positive at every (Infinite propagation speed for nonnegative heat data).
For the heat kernel is with unit mass, and is the evolution of The heat evolution of initial data (The heat kernel on and its causal extension).
Counterexample
The datum is measurable by [F1], is nonnegative everywhere with on a set of measure , is not the zero class, has , hence lies in , and has compact support .
Infinite propagation: since , and , the infinite-propagation corollary [F2] gives at every and every ; consequently the set on which the solution is nonzero is all of , so for every .
Fix any finite speed and any . At one has , but by step 2.1. Thus the required support inclusion fails for every proposed finite speed.
Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 exhibit a nonzero nonnegative compactly supported datum whose heat flow is strictly positive at every point at every positive time, so the support of the solution is the whole line although the support of the datum is ; the finite-propagation claim is refuted.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2025 archived author manuscript, AMS Graduate Studies in Mathematics) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Victor Ivrii, Partial Differential Equations (University of Toronto, 2018, CC BY-SA) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jared Speck, MIT 18.152 Introduction to Partial Differential Equations, Class Meeting #5: The Fundamental Solution for the Heat Equation (Fall 2011) (standard reference, not scraped)