Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hom is not exact

Statement refuted

For every object X in an abelian category, the functor A(−,X) is exact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: In Ab, the short exact sequence 0→Z→×2Z→Z/2→0.

[L1]

The category Ab is abelian (Abelian groups form an abelian category).

[L2]

Hom is left exact, but no right exactness was asserted (Hom is left exact in each variable).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1L1L2given

Apply Ab(−,Z) to the given short exact sequence. This yields 0→Hom⁡(Z/2,Z)→Hom⁡(Z,Z)→(×2)∗Hom⁡(Z,Z), which is left exact by [L2].

2.1step 1.1algebra

The group Hom⁡(Z,Z) is Z, and precomposition with ×2 is multiplication by 2 on that copy of Z. This map is not surjective, so the Hom sequence is not exact at the right-hand term.

3.1step 2.1∎

Therefore the contravariant Hom functor need not be exact.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources