How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cauchy averages admit no deterministic weak centering
Statement refuted
Assume countable choice and dependent choice. For IID real variables with density on , there is no deterministic real sequence for which in probability, where . Thus IID alone cannot guarantee a weak law even with varying deterministic centering.
Facts & Assumptions
Exact tail criterion for a truncated-centered IID weak law: For IID real random variables and , there exist deterministic real constants with in probability if and only if When this condition holds, works. Neither existence of an untruncated mean nor convergence of is asserted.
Countably many independent copies of a prescribed law exist: Assume countable choice and dependent choice. Every probability measure on is the common law of a countable independent family of -valued random elements.
Law or distribution of a random element: Let be a random element. Its law or distribution is the set function Thus the law of records the probability of each measurable target set by pulling it back to an event in the original probability space.
Probability laws correspond to distribution functions: Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. 1. Let be a real random variable, let be its law, and let . Then is nondecreasing and right-continuous, satisfies and obeys 2. Conversely, if is nondecreasing and right-continuous with then there is a unique Borel probability measure on such that equivalently
Counterexample
Given: The construction and assumptions above.
The nonnegative density has total integral and is nondecreasing and continuous with limits zero and one. The distribution-function correspondence therefore supplies its Borel probability law; the fundamental theorem of calculus identifies its density as . Under countable choice and dependent choice, construct IID copies with that law. Symmetry of the density gives .
For , . Integrating and multiplying by gives . Thus this tail quantity tends to , not zero. Necessity in the truncated-centering criterion rules out every deterministic centering sequence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Example 2.2.15, p. 65 (standard reference, not scraped)