How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rank-deficient noncommuting factors break pseudoinverse composition
Statement refuted
For every pair of bounded linear maps and between real or complex Hilbert spaces, the Moore–Penrose inverse of their composite satisfies .
Statement references
Setup
Take with the Euclidean inner product and let and . Both maps have rank one, they do not commute, and for the product is not .
Setup references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The matrices and on Euclidean , with .
Composite double regularization: The composite forward map has order ; a pseudoinverse product is not part of the composite definition.
The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse as the solution of the four Penrose equations: For a matrix , its Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse satisfies , , and the square products and are self-adjoint.
Every finite real or complex matrix has a unique Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse: Every finite real or complex matrix has a unique matrix satisfying the four Penrose equations.
Verification
Direct multiplication gives and , which are unequal. Each of is nonzero with a one-dimensional image, so both factors are rank deficient and noncommuting.
Put . Multiplication gives and . Since and are self-adjoint idempotents, , , and both and are self-adjoint. Thus satisfies all four equations in [F2], so by [F3].
The same equations show and , because each is a self-adjoint idempotent and hence satisfies the four Penrose equations; uniqueness in [F3] identifies them. Therefore . This refutes the universal identity.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christina Brandt and Patrick Horn, Regularisation and Parameter Choice Rules for Composite Linear Inverse Problems, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Roger Penrose, A generalized inverse for matrices (standard reference, not scraped)