How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonzero left-null datum passes the series test but is not in the range
Statement refuted
With standard Euclidean inner products, take given by . Define by ; for all and it satisfies , the defining adjoint identity. For this map let and . Its sole positive singular pair is , , : these are unit vectors spanning the input and range, and , . Define the Picard sum for this pair by Then satisfies and , but .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The real spaces and with their standard Euclidean inner products, the linear map , and .
A compact inverse model has Hilbert parameter/data spaces and a compact forward map, and exact solvability means finding with (Compact linear inverse model between Hilbert spaces).
A bounded linear map whose range has a finite ordered basis is compact (Bounded finite rank operators are compact).
A real inner product is linear in the first argument, symmetric and positive definite, and its induced norm is (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).
Every Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges in (The reals are complete).
A real inner-product space is Hilbert when it is complete in its induced norm (Hilbert space).
Counterexample
The standard dot products on and satisfy the inner-product axioms [F3] by coordinatewise addition, multiplication and for each coordinate. The standard Euclidean spaces and are complete: if a sequence is Cauchy in Euclidean norm, each coordinate is Cauchy because its absolute difference is bounded by the Euclidean distance; each coordinate converges by [F4], and the finite sum of squared coordinate errors tends to zero. Thus they are real Hilbert spaces by [F3] and [F5]. The map is linear and , so it is bounded; its range is the one-dimensional span of , and [F2] makes it compact. It therefore gives the stated compact linear inverse model by [F1].
For and , . Hence , while . In particular is a nonzero element of , and no scalar satisfies .
The vector spans the input and spans ; they satisfy and . Thus the positive singular pair has . The Picard sum defined in the statement has sole term . Step 1.2 shows that , so the missing orthogonality condition allows finite Picard sum without exact solvability.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Otmar Scherzer and Leonidas Mindrinos, Inverse Problems: Lecture Notes, University of Vienna, 2015, Theorem 6.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vesa Kaarnioja, Inverse Problems: Fourth Lecture, FU Berlin, 8 May 2023, PDF pp. 10–12 (standard reference, not scraped)