How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Mollifying a zero extension leaks across the boundary
Statement refuted
Smoothing a zero extension does not preserve zero boundary values. Let on , let be its extension by zero, and let be nonnegative, even, of unit mass, and supported in . For set and . Then is smooth on with bounded derivatives, but it has the one-sided endpoint limits and consequently for every . Thus mollification after zero extension produces a function with nonzero boundary values. The zero extension itself has jumps at the two endpoints; convolution smooths those jumps but does not impose zero Sobolev boundary values on the restriction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice; the constant on ; its zero extension ; a nonnegative even unit-mass supported in ; a scale and its rescaling ; the restriction ; and .
Under Countable Choice (implied by the assumed Axiom of Choice), is the closure of in the norm: if and only if for every there is a test function on within of (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).
Under the assumed Axiom of Choice, every on a nonempty open interval has exactly one continuous representative , which is locally absolutely continuous; if has finite endpoints then , extends uniquely to an absolutely continuous function on , and for (One-dimensional functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives).
Mean-value and endpoint estimate: for the representative of [F2] on there is with , and likewise at the endpoint , hence ; by Hölder on the finite interval this is at most with a constant depending only on (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, [F2]).
If , then the continuous representative of is itself and by compact support in the open interval. [F2, given]
For , the convolution is smooth on and equals ; it is the classical convolution of Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign. By the support hypothesis on and its rescaling in The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump, is supported in .
The zero extension does not belong to for any (A nonzero boundary value creates a zero-extension jump).
Choice use. The Axiom of Choice licenses the representative interface [F2], including its fundamental-theorem prerequisites. Countable Choice is inherited by the closure and convolution interfaces [F1] and [F5] and selects the sequence of test approximants in step 2.1.
Counterexample
The function is the restriction to of the smooth function of [F5]; hence is smooth on with bounded derivatives, so for every .
Endpoint values. Since is even, has mass one and is supported in with , and likewise .
The endpoint functional is continuous in the Sobolev norm: every has a representative with as in [F3], so and is a continuous linear functional on .
Every element of has zero endpoint value: if and are test functions with as in [F1], then by step 1.3 and [F4]
Suppose for some . By step 2.1 its continuous representative satisfies ; but by step 1.1 the function itself is continuous on with the endpoint limit of step 1.2, so its unique continuous representative from [F2] has , a contradiction. Hence for every .
Context. The zero extension used here is itself outside by [F6]; the present example isolates the additional failure of boundary values after mollification, namely that approaches at both endpoints although the original jump function has no values assigned at the endpoints.
Depends on
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- A nonzero boundary value creates a zero-extension jump
- One-dimensional $W^{1,p}$ functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign
- The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (2026), Definition 1.23 and Theorem 1.25 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (2020), Definition 3.11 and §3.6 (standard reference, not scraped)