How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Even reflection on the half-line
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let , , and define the even reflection for almost every . Then , with weak derivative and the norms satisfy The finite- factor is and not : the printed factor two in the source's Example 2.39 is a typographical slip for , while the normalisation genuinely has factor one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice; a class with ; and the even reflection .
Under the assumed Axiom of Choice, half-space extension for gives a bounded linear operator for every and , equal to on . For , its value at is , where for ; for it is even reflection (Integer-order Sobolev extension from a half-space).
Norm conventions: for and , and likewise on (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).
Linear change of variables: for the reflection and nonnegative measurable , , and (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not).
Verification
Take in [L1]. The moment system for is the single equation , so is the unique coefficient, and the extension operator of [L1] is for and for ; this is the even reflection . Hence for every , and its weak derivative satisfies on and on , as the instance of the reflection formula.
Finite . By [L3] and step 1.1, and ; adding the two components and using [L2] gives , that is, .
Case and the source comparison. Both and are even and agree on with , respectively , so their essential suprema coincide with those of and ; by [L2] the maximum norm is unchanged: . The displayed identity in the cited reflection example, which prints factor for and factor for , agrees with the computation at and ; the correct finite- factor is the of step 2.1.
Depends on
- Integer-order Sobolev extension from a half-space
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- A linear map $T$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$ sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with $\lambda_n(T[E])=|\det T|\,\lambda_n(E)$ when $T$ is invertible and $T[E]$ Lebesgue null when it is not
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (2026), Example 2.39 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (2020), Corollary 3.13 (standard reference, not scraped)