How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Moving a total-variation-null set changes a Hahn decomposition
Statement refuted
A Hahn decomposition is literally unique, not merely unique up to total-variation-null sets.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The zero signed measure on the discrete measurable space , where .
Hahn decompositions are unique only up to null sets. (Hahn decomposition for signed measures, unique up to total-variation-null sets)
A set is null exactly when its total variation is . (A set is null for a signed measure exactly when its total variation is zero there)
Counterexample
Because every measurable subset of has -value , every [L1] measurable set is both positive and negative. Thus are both Hahn decompositions.
The two decompositions are different, but the moved set is [L1, L2, step 1.1] ∎ -null and therefore has total variation by [L2]. This is exactly the allowed nonuniqueness in [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Theorem 6.18 (standard reference, not scraped)