Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hahn decomposition for signed measures, unique up to total-variation-null sets

Statement

Let ν be a signed measure on (X,A). Then there exist measurable sets P,N such that PN=,PN=X, P is positive for ν, and N is negative for ν.

If (P,N) is another such pair, then PP is null for ν and hence has total variation 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A signed measure ν on (X,A).

[L1]

A measurable set is positive, negative, or null according to the signs of the signed measures of all its measurable subsets. (Positive, negative, and null sets for a signed measure)

[L2]

A measurable set of positive finite signed measure contains a positive subset whose signed measure is at least as large. (A set of positive finite signed measure contains a positive subset of at least the same mass)

[L3]

A set is null for a signed measure exactly when its total variation there is 0. (A set is null for a signed measure exactly when its total variation is zero there)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Replacing ν by ν swaps positive and negative sets, so it is enough [L1, choose] to treat the case in which ν(E)<+ for every measurable E. Let m:=sup{ν(A):AA, A is positive}. Because is positive, m0. Choose positive sets An with ν(An)m, and put P:=nAn.

2.1

The union P is positive: if EP is measurable, define [L1, step 1.1] B0:=EA0 and Bn:=E(Ank<nAk) for n1. Then the Bn are pairwise disjoint measurable subsets of the positive sets An, so each ν(Bn)0 by [L1], and E=nBn. Countable additivity gives ν(E)=nν(Bn)0, so [L1] makes P positive. Because each AnP, one has ν(An)ν(P)m; letting n yields ν(P)=m<+.

3.1

Let N:=XP. If N were not negative, [L1] would give a [L1, L2, step 2.1] measurable EN with ν(E)>0. By [L2], E would contain a positive subset Q with ν(Q)ν(E)>0. Then PQ would be a positive set, Q would be disjoint from P, and ν(PQ)=ν(P)+ν(Q)>m, contradicting the definition of m. Hence N is negative.

4.1

If (P,N) is another Hahn decomposition, then [L1, L3, step 3.1] PPPN and PPPN. Thus each of PP and PP is both positive and negative, hence null by [L1]. Their union is PP, so [L3] gives ν(PP)=0.

5.1

Steps 2.1 through 4.1 give a positive set P, a negative set N=XP, [step 2.1, step 3.1, step 4.1] ∎ and uniqueness up to total-variation-null sets.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources