How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: a Hahn decomposition is unique
Statement
False claim. Every signed measure has exactly one Hahn decomposition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The zero signed measure on the discrete measurable space , where .
Hahn decompositions are unique only up to null sets. (Hahn decomposition for signed measures, unique up to total-variation-null sets)
Refutation
Every measurable subset of is both positive and negative for the zero [L1] measure, so both are Hahn decompositions.
These decompositions are different, so exact uniqueness fails. This is [L1, step 1.1] ∎ compatible with [L1] because the differing set is null.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Theorem 6.18 (standard reference, not scraped)