Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonuniqueness of Schur covers

Statement refuted

Every finite group has a unique Schur covering group up to isomorphism.

Counterexample

Assume the Axiom of Choice and supplied projective-resolution data for group homology. The groups D8 and Q8 are nonisomorphic Schur covers of C2×C2.

Given: The stated choice and resolution hypotheses. Both D8 and Q8 have central commutator subgroup of order two and quotient C2×C2.

1.1given

The exterior-square calculation gives M(C2×C2)≅C2, so both are Schur covers.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

D8 has five involutions while Q8 has one, hence they are not isomorphic.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources