How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multiplier of an abelian group
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and supplied projective-resolution data for group homology. For every abelian group , there is a natural isomorphism .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated choice and resolution hypotheses and a free presentation . Choice supplies a free presentation if one has not been supplied, and implies the dependent-choice hypothesis of Hopf formula for the Schur multiplier. Since is abelian, .
Proof
In , the subgroup is central. Since , this quotient has nilpotency class at most two. Thus its commutator is alternating and bilinear. Changing either lift by an element of does not change its commutator, so the rule defines a surjective homomorphism .
To check that there are no further relations, write . The class-two quotient is the free class-two group on the chosen free basis. Its central commutator subgroup is : ordering the basis, every commutator word reduces using and to a product of basic commutators with . Their independence follows by mapping the basis into the explicit class-two group with ; each word has finite support, so the displayed sum is finite.
The image of in is generated by with and in the image of in . The alternating universal property identifies with . Hence is injective as well as surjective. Since , Hopf formula for the Schur multiplier identifies under the stated hypotheses. Presentation maps preserve commutators and exterior products, and the canonical Hopf identification is natural, so the resulting isomorphism is natural in .
Depends on
Used by
- Nonuniqueness of Schur covers Counterexample
- Binary icosahedral cover of A5 Example
- Multiplier of a finite abelian group Example
- All finite Schur covers are unique False statement
- Universal coefficients split naturally False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Clara Löh, Group Cohomology (standard reference, not scraped)