Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Universal coefficients split naturally

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and supplied projective and injective resolution data for group (co)homology. For groups G and trivial G-modules A, the degree-two universal-coefficient short exact sequence splits naturally in G and A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated choice and resolution hypotheses. Fix A=C2 with trivial action and V=C2×C2, written as F22. Write pG:H2(G;A)→Hom⁡(M(G),A) for the universal-coefficient map.

[L1]

Universal coefficients in degree two supplies the degree-two universal-coefficient map pG under the stated hypotheses. The contradiction uses the hypothesized natural section only for finite groups.

[L2]

A cyclic group has zero Schur multiplier (Multiplier of a cyclic group).

[L3]

For an abelian group B, M(B)≅⋀2B (Multiplier of an abelian group), and alternating bilinear maps factor through its exterior square (Alternating universal property).

[L4]

Classes in H2(G;A) naturally classify central extensions of G by A when the action is trivial (H^2 classifies extensions with fixed abelian kernel action). Under this classification, restriction to a subgroup pulls back the extension, and zero represents a split extension: restricting a factor set gives the pullback factor set, and a homomorphic section has zero factor set.

Refutation

technique · contradiction
1.1L1L2assume-contra

Suppose there are splitting homomorphisms sG:Hom⁡(M(G),A)→H2(G;A) natural in G, with pGsG=id. For every subgroup inclusion i:L↪V with L≅C2, [L2] gives M(L)=0, so naturality forces i∗sV(λ)=sL(λ∘M(i))=sL(0)=0 for every λ:M(V)→A.

2.1L3step 1.1constructalgebra

The map b((x1,x2),(y1,y2))=x1y2+x2y1 is alternating and bilinear to A. It takes value 1 on the standard basis pair, so [L3] supplies a nonzero homomorphism λ:M(V)→A. Put α=sV(λ). Then pV(α)=λ≠0.

3.1L4step 1.1step 2.1

Represent α by a central extension 1→A→E→πV→1. Its restriction to each of the three order-two subgroups L≤V is zero by step 1.1. Hence each preimage π−1(L) is a split central extension, isomorphic to C2×C2, and every element of that preimage has square 1.

4.1step 3.1choosealgebra

Every element of E either belongs to the kernel A, or maps to a nonzero vector of V and therefore belongs to one of these three preimages. Thus every element of E has square 1. For x,y∈E, this gives xy=(xy)−1=y−1x−1=yx, so E is abelian. Choose lifts u,v of the two standard basis vectors of V. Since u2=v2=1 and uv=vu, the map (a,b)↦uavb is a homomorphic section of π.

5.1L4L1step 2.1step 4.1discharge-contradiction∎

This section makes α=0, contradicting pV(α)=λ≠0. Therefore no splitting can be natural in the group variable even for the fixed coefficient group C2, and in particular none is natural in both variables. Under the Axiom of Choice, the individual sequences split after choices by the separate splitting theorem cited in [L1].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources