How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multiplier of a cyclic group
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and supplied projective-resolution data for group homology. Then for every cyclic group .
Proof
Given: The stated choice and resolution hypotheses. For finite cyclic , take and ; the infinite cyclic group has . Choice implies the dependent choice required by Hopf formula for the Schur multiplier.
The group is abelian, hence .
Under the stated hypotheses, Hopf's formula gives in both cases. The trivial group is also cyclic; its free presentation gives the same result.
Depends on
Used by
- Binary icosahedral cover of A5 Example
- Multiplier of a cyclic group Example
- Universal coefficients split naturally False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Clara Löh, Group Cohomology (standard reference, not scraped)