How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hopf formula for the Schur multiplier
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice and supplied projective-resolution data for group homology. For with free, .
Proof
Given: Dependent choice, the supplied group-homology resolution data, and a free presentation .
Under the stated hypotheses, Low-degree sequence of a free presentation gives an injection whose image is the kernel of . This kernel is , since the map sends to .
Exactness identifies that kernel with by Schur multiplier, giving the stated isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
- Multiplier of a finitely presented group Corollary
- Multiplier of a cyclic group Proposition
- Multiplier of a free group Proposition
- Existence of Schur covering groups Theorem
- Multiplier of an abelian group Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Clara Löh, Group Cohomology (standard reference, not scraped)