How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hopf formula for the Schur multiplier
Statement
For G=F/R with F free, M(G)≅(R∩[F,F])/[F,R].
Proof
Given: Let with free.
In the low-degree exact sequence, the kernel of is .
Exactness identifies that kernel with , giving the stated isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
- Hopf formula is presentation-independent Corollary
- Kernel of the universal central extension Corollary
- Multiplier of a finitely presented group Corollary
- Hopf formula from a one-relator presentation Example
- Multiplier of a cyclic group Proposition
- Multiplier of a free group Proposition
- Existence of Schur covering groups Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Clara Löh, Group Cohomology (standard reference, not scraped)