How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Binary icosahedral cover of A5
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice and supplied projective-resolution data for group homology. The central quotient is the binary-icosahedral universal central extension.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated choice and resolution hypotheses. Weibel, §6.9, Example 6.9.1, explicitly identifies . The proof below calculates the multiplier and the universal property; it does not use Weibel's assertion of universality as a proof premise.
If is a Sylow subgroup of a finite group , the transfer identity gives on (Corestriction after transfer multiplies by the index). Choice and the supplied-resolution convention give this identity in the canonical homology groups.
Verification
has order . Its nonidentity conjugacy classes have sizes (three-cycles), (products of two disjoint transpositions), and (the two classes of five-cycles). No proper union of these classes with the identity has order dividing , so is simple. It is nonabelian, hence its commutator subgroup is all of : is perfect. Its Sylow- subgroup has order and cannot be cyclic, since a permutation of order in is odd; it is . Its Sylow- and Sylow- subgroups are cyclic.
The quotient has central kernel . The group is perfect. Indeed, elementary row reduction shows it is generated by the elementary matrices . For , conjugation multiplies the upper parameter by and the lower parameter by . Thus for ; since is a unit in , every elementary generator is a commutator.
The multiplier is finite and annihilated by . For each prime , [L1] says that its -primary part is the image of : multiplication by the index , prime to , is an automorphism on the -primary part. The cyclic-group calculation gives for . For , the abelian-multiplier theorem gives . Consequently is either or .
Choose a free presentation of the perfect group . Under Choice, Free-presentation construction is universal gives its universal central extension , and the kernel corollary identifies with . If this multiplier were zero, universality would give a homomorphic section of the central quotient. The latter group would then be , contradicting its perfectness from step 1.2. Hence by step 2.1.
Universality gives a map over . Its image, together with the central kernel , generates . Because that group is perfect, its commutator subgroup lies in the image, so the map is surjective. Both and have order , so it is an isomorphism over . This proves the asserted universal central extension.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 6, Example 6.9.1 (standard reference, not scraped)