Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

H^2 classifies extensions with fixed abelian kernel action

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a fixed group G and abelian G-module M, the set of equivalence classes of extensions of G by M inducing the given action is in natural bijection with H2(G,M).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a group G and an abelian G-module M.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) supplies a choice from every family of nonempty fibres.

[L1]

Every such extension determines a well-defined class in H2(G,M) (An extension determines a well-defined H^2 class).

[L2]

Cohomologous two-cocycles give equivalent twisted-product extensions, and equivalent twisted products have cohomologous cocycles (Cohomologous two-cocycles give equivalent extensions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1L1given

For each extension under consideration, apply [A1] to the nonempty fibres of its quotient map over g≠1, and set s(1)=1. This gives a normalized section. Map an extension class to the cohomology class of the factor set of any normalized section. This is well defined by [L1].

2.1L2step 1.1choosealgebra

Every class [f]∈H2(G,M) is hit: choose a normalized cocycle representative f, build the twisted product M×fG, and use its standard section g↦(0,g). The factor set of that section is exactly f, so step 1.1 sends the resulting extension to [f].

2.2step 1.1givenconstructalgebra

If an extension 1→M→iE→πG→1 has normalized section s with factor set fs, then Ψ:M×fsG→E,Ψ(m,g)=i(m)s(g), is an extension equivalence. Its inverse sends x∈E to (i−1(x s(π(x))−1),π(x)), and the factor-set identity shows that Ψ respects multiplication.

3.1L2step 2.2algebra

If two extensions define the same cohomology class, then after choosing normalized sections their factor sets are cohomologous. By [L2], the corresponding twisted products are equivalent extensions. Composing those equivalences with the ones from step 2.2 shows that the original extensions are equivalent. Thus the map of step 1.1 is injective.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 show that step 1.1 is a bijection.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources