CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Central extensions are classified by H^2 with trivial action

Statement

If $A$ is an abelian group with trivial $G$ -action, then equivalence classes of central extensions

$1 \to A \to E \to G \to 1$

are classified by $H^{2} (G, A)$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group $G$ and an abelian group $A$ with trivial $G$ -action.

[L1]

$H^{2} (G, M)$ classifies extensions with a fixed abelian kernel action (H^2 classifies extensions with fixed abelian kernel action).

[L2]

The zero class is the split semidirect-product class (The zero H^2 class is equivalent to splitting).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1

With trivial action, the condition defining an extension inducing the prescribed action says that every lift of every $g \in G$ centralizes the kernel $A$ . That is exactly the statement that the kernel is central in $E$ .

givenalgebra

2.1

Therefore [L1] applies with $M = A$ and identifies $H^{2} (G, A)$ with the equivalence classes of central extensions. The split class singled out by [L2] is the direct-product class because the action is trivial.

L1L2step 1.1

3.1

Hence central extensions are classified by $H^{2} (G, A)$ .

step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Central extensions of a cyclic group Example
Quaternion and dihedral central extension classes Example

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

Clara Loh, Group Cohomology, SS 2019 (standard reference, not scraped)
Caroline Lassueur, Cohomology of Groups, SS 2021 (standard reference, not scraped)