Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The objectwise image of a sheaf morphism need not be a sheaf

Statement refuted

For every morphism of sheaves of sets, the objectwise image presheaf is already a subsheaf of the target.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sheaf morphism exp:C0(,R)C0(,S1),expU(f)(z)=e2πif(z), on the circle X=S1.

[F1]

A subsheaf must in particular be a sheaf (Subsheaves).

[L1]

The image sheaf is obtained by sheafifying the objectwise image presheaf (The image sheaf is the sheafification of the presheaf image).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Let U1=S1{(1,0)} and U2=S1{(1,0)}. These open arcs cover S1. On each Ui choose a continuous argument θi:UiR with e2πiθi(z)=z. Therefore the identity map idS1 restricts to sections in the objectwise image presheaf on both U1 and U2.

givenchooseconstruct
2.1

On the overlap U1U2, both local sections are equal to the same target section idS1U1U2, so they are compatible.

step 1.1given
3.1

Suppose idS1 lay in the global objectwise image. Then there would be a continuous f:S1R with e2πif(z)=z for every zS1. Writing z=e2πit with t[0,1], the function g(t):=f(e2πit)t is continuous and integer valued, hence constant. So f(e2πit)=t+n for some fixed integer n. Evaluating at t=0 and t=1 gives two values of f at the same point 1S1, namely n and n+1, a contradiction. Thus idS1 is not in the global objectwise image.

step 2.1given
4.1

Steps 1.1 to 3.1 give compatible local sections in the image presheaf that do not glue globally, so the objectwise image is not a sheaf and hence not a subsheaf by [F1]. By [L1], its sheafification is the correct image sheaf.

F1L1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources