Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Omitting the second-stage correction destroys cubic local accuracy

Statement

On y′=y from y=1, with J=1, T~=0, and α=1−1/2, consider the incorrect variant that retains k1=(1−αh)−1y and the midpoint evaluation F1=f(y+hk1/2) but replaces the corrected second stage by (1−αh)ℓ2=F1 and returns y+hℓ2. Its one-step expansion is y+=y+hy+(α+12)h2y+O(h3), whereas the exact flow is exp⁡(h)=1+h+12h2+O(h3). Since α>0, the altered method has a nonzero O(h2) local defect and fails the cubic local-error condition for order two. The altered formula does not satisfy the proper method's stage equations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: f(y)=y, initial y=1, J=1, h>0 small, and α=1−1/2.

[F1]

Two-stage second-order Rosenbrock W-method with shared factorization: the correct stages use the second right-hand side F1−k1 and then set k2=q2+k1.

[F2]

If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz: a differentiable vector curve with integrable derivative has endpoint difference equal to the integral of its derivative.

[F3]

The exponential is the unique solution of y′=y with y(0)=1: any differentiable solution on R of Y′=Y, Y(0)=1 equals exp⁡.

[F4]

The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡: every derivative of exp⁡ equals exp⁡.

[F5]

The exponential function is strictly increasing: exp⁡ is increasing on R.

[F6]

The real exponential function and the number e by a power series: exp⁡(s)=∑n=0∞sn/n!, so exp⁡(0)=1.

[F7]

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1givenalgebra

Define the altered variant as stated. Since W=1−αh, its first stage is k1=y/(1−αh). The midpoint value is F1=y+(h/2)k1, and the altered second solve gives ℓ2=F1/(1−αh).

1.2givenF3F4F6

Define Y(s)=exp⁡(s) for s∈R. By [F4], Y′=Y, and [F6] gives Y(0)=1; thus this is an exact solution of the IVP (unique on R by [F3]).

2.1step 1.1algebra

Put r=(1−αh)−1. The exact identity (1−x)−1=1+x+x2+x3/(1−x) shows r=1+αh+α2h2+O(h3); for 0<h≤1/(2α) the remainder is bounded by 2α3h3. Squaring this finite expansion gives r2=1+2αh+3α2h2+O(h3), with a bounded remainder on the same interval. Since F1=y+(h/2)k1=y(1+hr/2), the altered second stage is ℓ2=F1r=y(r+hr2/2)=y(1+(α+1/2)h+(α2+α)h2+O(h3)). Multiplying by h and adding y gives the displayed one-step expansion.

2.2step 1.2F4F5

By [F4], Y′′′(s)=exp⁡(s); since 0≤s≤h≤1, [F5] gives Y′′′(s)≤exp⁡(1).

3.1F2F4F7step 2.1step 2.2algebra

The derivatives of Y are continuous by [F4] and integrable on each compact subinterval by [F7]. Three applications of [F2] give exp⁡(h)=1+h+h2/2+R, where R=∫0h(h−s)2Y′′′(s)/2 ds and ∣R∣≤exp⁡(1)h3/6. Subtracting this expansion from the altered update in step 2.1 leaves αh2+O(h3), which is not bounded by Ch3 for any fixed C as h↓0 because α>0. Thus the altered scheme fails the cubic local-error condition for order two.

4.1F1step 3.1∎

The proper method's second right-hand side and corrected output are exactly the two terms changed in this variant by [F1]. Step 3.1 proves the altered formula has no cubic local defect, and this item makes no global-rate claim for it.

Finite check

For h=0.01 and y=1, the leading local-defect coefficient is αh2≈2.9289×10−5; the exact Taylor coefficient at h2 is 1/2, while the altered coefficient is 1/2+α.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources