How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The function 1 / z makes the large-semicircle shortcut fail
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: the pointwise decay of along larger and larger upper semicircles is enough to force the arc integral to vanish.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function and the upper semicircles .
Counterexample
On the upper semicircle one has
So the arc integral is constant, not vanishing, even though is pointwise on the arc. This is the concrete witness behind FALSE: pointwise decay alone makes every large semicircle integral vanish.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 §5.3 (standard reference, not scraped)