Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The function 1 / z makes the large-semicircle shortcut fail

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: the pointwise decay of 1/z along larger and larger upper semicircles is enough to force the arc integral to vanish.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The function f(z)=1/z and the upper semicircles γR+(t)=Reit.

Counterexample

technique · computation
1.1

On the upper semicircle γR+(t)=Reit one has γR+dzz=0πiReitReitdt=iπ.

givenalgebra
2.1

So the arc integral is constant, not vanishing, even though 1/(Reit) is pointwise O(R1) on the arc. This is the concrete witness behind FALSE: pointwise decay alone makes every large semicircle integral vanish.

step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources