Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: pointwise decay alone makes every large semicircle integral vanish

Statement

False claim: if f(z)→0 pointwise on the upper semicircle ∣z∣=R as R→∞, then ∫γR+f(z) dz→0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The function f(z)=1/z and the upper semicircles γR+(t)=Reit.

[L1]

The correct large-arc lemma assumes control of z f(z), not only of f(z) itself (A rational large-semicircle integral vanishes under the zR(z) to 0 condition).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Along the upper semicircle, f(Reit)=e−it/R→0 pointwise. But ∫γR+dzz=∫0πiReitReit dt=iπ.

2.1L1

So the arc integral does not tend to 0 even though the pointwise values do. [step 1.1, L1] ∎ This is exactly why requires the stronger hypothesis on zf(z).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources