How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: pointwise decay alone makes every large semicircle integral vanish
Statement
False claim: if pointwise on the upper semicircle as , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function and the upper semicircles .
The correct large-arc lemma assumes control of , not only of itself (A rational large-semicircle integral vanishes under the zR(z) to 0 condition).
Refutation
Along the upper semicircle, pointwise. But
So the arc integral does not tend to even though the pointwise values do. [step 1.1, L1] ∎ This is exactly why requires the stronger hypothesis on .
Depends on
Used by
- The function 1 / z makes the large-semicircle shortcut fail Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 §5.3 (standard reference, not scraped)