How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: denominator degree one more than numerator degree already forces convergence
Statement
False claim: if is rational and , then must converge.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rational function on , or symmetrically on the punctured real line.
The two-degree gap in the rational residue theorem is the one used for unconditional improper convergence (Rational improper integrals without real poles are upper-half-plane residue sums).
The rational -test diverges at exponent (The improper -test for rational exponents).
Refutation
A degree drop by one means that at infinity the rational function behaves like with . The model case is exactly the tail in [L2], whose integral diverges logarithmically.
Therefore the hypothesis does not force improper [step 1.1, L1] ∎ convergence. The theorem uses the stronger two-degree gap for a reason.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 §5.3 (standard reference, not scraped)