Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational improper integrals without real poles are upper-half-plane residue sums

Statement

Let R=p/q be a rational function with deg⁡q≥deg⁡p+2, and assume that q has no real zero. Then

∫−∞∞R(x) dx

converges, and

∫−∞∞R(x) dx=2πi∑ℑa>0Res⁡(R,a),

where the sum runs over the poles of R in the upper half-plane.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational function R=p/q with deg⁡q≥deg⁡p+2 and no real pole.

[L1]

The residue theorem holds for the large upper semicircle contour (The residue theorem for a null-homologous cycle).

[L2]

If sup⁡∣z∣=T, ℑz≥0∣zR(z)∣→0, then the upper semicircle integral tends to 0 (A rational large-semicircle integral vanishes under the zR(z) to 0 condition).

[L3]

The degree gap deg⁡q≥deg⁡p+2 makes R(x)=O(x−2) on the real line, so the improper integral converges by comparison with the rational p-test at exponent 2 (The improper p-test for rational exponents).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL3

By [L3], the real improper integral converges. The same degree gap implies zR(z)→0 as ∣z∣→∞, because the numerator degree is at least two less than the denominator degree.

2.1step 1.1L1

Let ΓT be the contour formed by [−T,T] and the upper semicircle [L1] γT+. For all sufficiently large T, the contour avoids every pole of R and encloses exactly the poles of R with positive imaginary part. So gives ∫−TTR(x) dx+∫γT+R(z) dz=2πi∑ℑa>0Res⁡(R,a).

3.1step 2.1L2L3∎

By step 1.1 and [L2], the arc integral tends to 0 as T→∞. The straight-piece integral tends to ∫−∞∞R(x) dx by step 1.1. Passing to the limit in step 2.1 yields the residue formula.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources