Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational improper integrals without real poles are upper-half-plane residue sums

Statement

Let R=p/q be a rational function with degqdegp+2, and assume that q has no real zero. Then

R(x)dx

converges, and

R(x)dx=2πia>0Res(R,a),

where the sum runs over the poles of R in the upper half-plane.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational function R=p/q with degqdegp+2 and no real pole.

[L1]

The residue theorem holds for the large upper semicircle contour (The residue theorem for a null-homologous cycle).

[L2]

If supz=T, z0zR(z)0, then the upper semicircle integral tends to 0 (A rational large-semicircle integral vanishes under the zR(z) to 0 condition).

[L3]

The degree gap degqdegp+2 makes R(x)=O(x2) on the real line, so the improper integral converges by comparison with the rational p-test at exponent 2 (The improper p-test for rational exponents).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L3], the real improper integral converges. The same degree gap implies zR(z)0 as z, because the numerator degree is at least two less than the denominator degree.

givenL3
2.1

Let ΓT be the contour formed by [T,T] and the upper semicircle [L1] γT+. For all sufficiently large T, the contour avoids every pole of R and encloses exactly the poles of R with positive imaginary part. So gives TTR(x)dx+γT+R(z)dz=2πia>0Res(R,a).

step 1.1L1
3.1

By step 1.1 and [L2], the arc integral tends to 0 as T. The straight-piece integral tends to R(x)dx by step 1.1. Passing to the limit in step 2.1 yields the residue formula.

step 2.1L2L3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources