How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A rational large-semicircle integral vanishes under the zR(z) to 0 condition
Statement
Let be a rational function, and for let for . Assume that meets no pole of for all sufficiently large , and that
Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A rational function and the upper semicircles .
Proof
Along one has , so
The arc length of is . Therefore the ML estimate gives
The right-hand side tends to by hypothesis, so the arc integral tends to as claimed.
Depends on
Used by
- FALSE: pointwise decay alone makes every large semicircle integral vanish False statement
- Jordan's lemma for rational functions of one complex variable Lemma
- Indented real-axis contours compute principal values with half-residue corrections Theorem
- Rational improper integrals without real poles are upper-half-plane residue sums Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 §5.3 (standard reference, not scraped)