Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A rational large-semicircle integral vanishes under the zR(z) to 0 condition

Statement

Let R be a rational function, and for T>0 let γT+(t)=Teit for 0tπ. Assume that γT+ meets no pole of R for all sufficiently large T, and that

sup0tπγT+(t)R(γT+(t))0(T).

Then

γT+R(z)dz0(T).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational function R and the upper semicircles γT+(t)=Teit.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Along γT+ one has γT+(t)=T, so R(γT+(t))1Tsup0sπγT+(s)R(γT+(s)).

given
2.1

The arc length of γT+ is πT. Therefore the ML estimate gives γT+R(z)dzπT1Tsup0sπγT+(s)R(γT+(s))=πsup0sπγT+(s)R(γT+(s)).

step 1.1
3.1

The right-hand side tends to 0 by hypothesis, so the arc integral tends to 0 as claimed.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources