Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A rational large-semicircle integral vanishes under the zR(z) to 0 condition

Statement

Let R be a rational function, and for T>0 let γT+(t)=Teit for 0≤t≤π. Assume that γT+ meets no pole of R for all sufficiently large T, and that

sup⁡0≤t≤π∣ γT+(t) R(γT+(t)) ∣⟶0(T→∞).

Then

∫γT+R(z) dz⟶0(T→∞).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational function R and the upper semicircles γT+(t)=Teit.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

Along γT+ one has ∣γT+(t)∣=T, so ∣R(γT+(t))∣≤1Tsup⁡0≤s≤π∣ γT+(s)R(γT+(s)) ∣.

2.1step 1.1

The arc length of γT+ is πT. Therefore the ML estimate gives ∣∫γT+R(z) dz∣≤πT⋅1Tsup⁡0≤s≤π∣ γT+(s)R(γT+(s)) ∣=πsup⁡0≤s≤π∣ γT+(s)R(γT+(s)) ∣.

3.1step 2.1∎

The right-hand side tends to 0 by hypothesis, so the arc integral tends to 0 as claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources