How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An indented arc around a simple singularity contributes the expected residue fraction
Statement
Let have a simple pole at , let , and for arbitrary real angles let be the circular arc oriented from angle to angle inside . Then
In particular, an upper indentation from left to right contributes and a lower indentation contributes .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A simple pole of at and the oriented arc .
At a simple pole, the Laurent principal part is , where ; hence with holomorphic near (Simple poles, The residue of an isolated singularity).
Proof
Write as in [L1]. Along the arc, put . Then and , so
The holomorphic function is bounded on a small closed disc around , say by . Hence which tends to with .
Adding the two parts from steps 1.1 and 2.1 proves the limit formula. The two indentation special cases are the choices and .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. Howell and J. Mathews, Complex Analysis, Ch. 8 §8.5 (standard reference, not scraped)