How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
No uniform subdivision depth for all singular simplices
Statement refuted
For a fixed nontrivial two-open cover of and integer coefficients, no single integer makes cover-small for every singular -simplex taken with coefficient .
Counterexample
Given: A proposed depth and overlapping proper open intervals covering .
Proof technique: direct.
Choose and . On each of the dyadic subintervals of the parameter interval, define linearly from to or from to , alternating orientations so the pieces join continuously.
Every singular -simplex occurring in has image containing both and , hence lies in neither nor . In degree one all these subdivision summands have coefficient over ; coincident summands add rather than cancel. Thus a non-small term survives and is not cover-small, disproving uniformity.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Proposition 2.21 (standard reference, not scraped)