How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite chains eventually become cover-small
Statement
If the interiors of cover , then for every finite singular chain there is with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite chain and a cover whose interiors cover .
Proof
The image of each simplex of is compact, so its pulled-back cover has a Lebesgue number; mesh decay supplies a subdivision depth making every subsimplex image lie in one cover member.
There are finitely many original simplices, so the maximum of their finitely many depths works for all of them. Thus is cover-small; no depth is claimed for all singular simplices at once.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Proposition 2.21 (standard reference, not scraped)