How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A periodic perturbation preserves the Gamma recurrence and factorial values
Statement refuted
Every meromorphic function with the Gamma recurrence and the Gamma factorial values must equal Gamma.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The perturbed function .
The false-statement refutation already proves that satisfies the Gamma recurrence and the Gamma factorial values, but is not equal to Gamma (FALSE: the Gamma recurrence and factorial values characterize Gamma).
Counterexample
The function is meromorphic, because Gamma is meromorphic and the exponential factor is entire.
By [L1], this same has the Gamma recurrence and the Gamma factorial values while still differing from Gamma. Hence it is a counterexample to the statement refuted.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Chandrasekharan, Lectures on the Riemann Zeta-Function, Lecture 7 §4 (standard reference, not scraped)