How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the Gamma function is entire
Statement
False claim: The Gamma function is entire.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The meromorphic continuation theorem for Gamma.
Gamma extends meromorphically to with simple poles at (Meromorphic continuation of Gamma).
Refutation
By [L1], Gamma has a pole at and therefore is not holomorphic there.
An entire function is holomorphic on all of , so step 1.1 contradicts the claim. Hence Gamma is not entire.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Chandrasekharan, Lectures on the Riemann Zeta-Function, Lecture 6 §2 (standard reference, not scraped)