How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Polar coordinates on a full closed angular period are not injective and are singular at radius zero
Statement refuted
False claim. The polar map is injective with invertible derivative on every closed rectangle of nonnegative radii and one full angular period.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polar map on .
Sine and cosine have common period (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi).
Sine and cosine satisfy (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).
Counterexample
For every , periodicity [L1] gives although the two parameter points differ. Thus the two closed seam faces already destroy injectivity.
At , every angle maps to the origin, providing infinitely many preimages even away from comparing the seam endpoints.
Direct differentiation and [L2] give . Thus , so the derivative is singular along the entire zero-radius edge and the map violates both claimed hypotheses.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.