How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Polar coordinates do not give a chart at the origin
Statement refuted
Polar coordinates give a smooth chart on all of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polar formulas .
A smooth chart must be a homeomorphism from an open set of the manifold onto an open subset of Euclidean space (Chart maps are diffeomorphisms onto Euclidean open sets).
Counterexample
At the origin, the angle coordinate is not defined, and for the same point admits many values of differing by multiples of .
Therefore the polar description is not a single-valued homeomorphism on any neighbourhood containing the origin, so it cannot be a chart there by [F1].
This refutes the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)