How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tangent Cotangent and the Differential — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples compute tangent and cotangent objects in standard coordinates, while the counterexamples isolate exactly where chart dependence and bad coordinate choices break the intrinsic constructions.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The tangent space of Euclidean space
Example
At a point , the tangent space identifies canonically with : a vector corresponds both to the derivation and to the curve velocity of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A point and a vector .
Coordinate derivations form a basis of the tangent space (Coordinate derivations form a basis of the tangent space).
Curve classes are canonically identified with tangent derivations (Curve contact classes are canonically isomorphic to derivation tangent vectors).
Verification
In the standard chart on , the tangent basis is the standard coordinate basis by [L1].
The vector defines both the derivation and the velocity of the straight line , and [L2] identifies these two descriptions.
Thus is canonically the usual vector space .
Tangent basis change between Cartesian and polar coordinates
Example
On every polar-coordinate chart in , the coordinate basis satisfies and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open set carrying a smooth polar angle , with coordinate change , .
Tangent bases transform by the Jacobian of the coordinate change (Change-of-coordinate formula for tangent bases).
Verification
The Jacobian of is .
Applying [L1] with this Jacobian gives the displayed formulas for and in the Cartesian basis.
This is the standard basis-change example.
The differential of a map between spheres in stereographic coordinates
Example
For the smooth map , , the stereographic coordinate representative is the rational map on the overlap where both sides are defined. Its differential is multiplication by the derivative .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The degree-two map on the circle and compatible stereographic charts.
The differential in coordinates is given by the Jacobian of the coordinate representative (Coordinate formula for the differential).
Verification
In stereographic coordinates, the map is .
Differentiating this rational function gives , so [L1] identifies this scalar as the matrix of the differential in the chosen one-dimensional bases.
Hence the differential is explicitly computed by the coordinate formula.
The tangent space of the sphere from curve velocities
Example
For , sending a curve contact class to its ambient derivative canonically identifies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A point .
Tangent vectors are the same as curve velocities through the point (Curve contact classes are canonically isomorphic to derivation tangent vectors).
Verification
If is the velocity of a curve in with , then differentiating at gives .
Conversely, if , the normalized curve lies in , satisfies , and has velocity at .
Contact-equivalent curves have the same coordinate, hence ambient, velocity, so the displayed map is well defined. Conversely, choose an index with and the standard sphere chart on the hemisphere where the sign of the th coordinate is fixed, obtained by deleting that coordinate. If two curves have the same ambient derivative, their derivatives after this coordinate deletion agree, so they are contact equivalent. The ambient-derivative map is therefore injective. Steps 1.1-1.2 show that its image is exactly , and [L1] identifies its domain with the derivation tangent space.
The tangent bundle of the circle is a cylinder
Example
The tangent bundle of is diffeomorphic to the cylinder . If and , the diffeomorphism sends to the tangent derivation represented by Under the canonical ambient-velocity identification, this tangent vector is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A point and a scalar .
The tangent bundle is a smooth manifold whose fibers are the tangent spaces (Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure).
Curve contact classes are canonically identified with derivation tangent vectors (Curve contact classes are canonically isomorphic to derivation tangent vectors).
A smooth coordinate chart induces tangent-bundle coordinates by recording the coefficients in its coordinate tangent basis (The induced tangent bundle chart).
Verification
The curve lies in , starts at , and has ambient derivative at . By [L2] it therefore determines a tangent derivation at .
Let and choose a local angle chart around . Its coordinate tangent vector has ambient velocity , so [L2] makes every tangent derivation over this arc uniquely . In the induced chart of [L3], the displayed map is therefore Thus it and its inverse are smooth on every such bundle-chart domain.
Hence is a cylinder.
The tangent bundle of Euclidean space is trivial
Example
For every , the tangent bundle is canonically diffeomorphic to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Euclidean space with its standard chart.
The tangent bundle is built from the induced bundle charts of the base atlas (Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure).
Verification
The standard global chart on induces a global tangent-bundle chart .
Because there is only one chart, there are no nontrivial transition maps, so this induced chart is a global diffeomorphism.
Therefore is trivial.
The cotangent pullback of a coordinate one-form
Example
For given by , one has and for the standard coordinate one-forms on the target.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The map .
Pullback of a cotangent vector is composition with the differential (Pullback of a cotangent vector).
Verification
The coordinate function is , so .
Likewise , so .
Thus coordinate one-forms pull back by the expected substitution rule.
The differential of a constant map is zero
Example
If is constant, then for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A constant smooth map .
The differential acts by pullback of target germs (The differential of a smooth map).
Verification
For any target germ , the composite is constant near every point of .
Every derivation annihilates constant germs, so for every .
Hence .
Polar coordinates do not give a chart at the origin
Statement refuted
Polar coordinates give a smooth chart on all of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polar formulas .
A smooth chart must be a homeomorphism from an open set of the manifold onto an open subset of Euclidean space (Chart maps are diffeomorphisms onto Euclidean open sets).
Counterexample
At the origin, the angle coordinate is not defined, and for the same point admits many values of differing by multiples of .
Therefore the polar description is not a single-valued homeomorphism on any neighbourhood containing the origin, so it cannot be a chart there by [F1].
This refutes the statement.
A coordinate tuple is not an intrinsic tangent vector
Statement refuted
The coordinate tuple of a tangent vector is itself an intrinsic tangent vector.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The manifold at with coordinates and .
Tangent bases change by the Jacobian of the coordinate transition (Change-of-coordinate formula for tangent bases).
Counterexample
Let . In the -chart its coordinate tuple is , while [L1] gives , so in the -chart its coordinate tuple is .
The same intrinsic tangent vector therefore has different coordinate tuples in different charts.
Hence the tuple itself is chart dependent and not the intrinsic tangent vector.