Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

fk(x)=xk+1 converges pointwise but not uniformly on [0,1]

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: pointwise convergence of real-valued functions on a closed bounded interval implies uniform convergence.

For k∈N define fk:[0,1]→R by

fk(x):=xk+1.

Then (fk) converges pointwise to the endpoint indicator

χ(x):={0,0≤x<1,1,x=1,

but the convergence is not uniform.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The functions fk(x)=xk+1 and the endpoint indicator χ on [0,1].

[L2]

Bernoulli's inequality says (1+t)n≥1+ι(n)t for t≥−1 and n∈N (Bernoulli's inequality (1+x)n≥1+nx, The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field).

[L3]

The canonical naturals satisfy ι(k+1)>0, and positive reciprocals reverse nonstrict inequalities (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L4]

Uniform convergence requires one index after which the error is below every prescribed positive real at every point of the domain (Pointwise convergence, uniform convergence, and the uniformly Cauchy condition for sequences of real-valued functions).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

If 0≤x<1, then ∣x∣<1, so [L1] gives xk+1→0=χ(x); at x=1, one has fk(1)=1=χ(1) for every k. Thus fk→χ pointwise.

L1
1.2

For each k, put ak:=ι(k+1)>0 and yk:=1−1/(2ak). Then 0≤yk<1, so χ(yk)=0.

L3algebra
2.1

Apply [L2] with n=k+1 and t=−1/(2ak): fk(yk)=(1−1/(2ak))k+1≥1−ak/(2ak)=1/2.

step 1.2L2L3algebra
3.1

Hence ∣fk(yk)−χ(yk)∣≥1/2 for every k, so no index makes the error smaller than 1/2 at every point; the convergence is not uniform.

step 1.2step 2.1L4
4.1

The functions therefore satisfy the refuted claim's hypothesis and violate its conclusion.

step 1.1step 3.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources