How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded continuous functions need not form a sheaf
Statement refuted
The assignment with the usual restriction maps is a sheaf on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The presheaf on .
Restriction of a bounded continuous function is again bounded and continuous, so this is a presheaf (A presheaf on a topological space).
A sheaf must glue every compatible local family to a global section (A sheaf on a topological space).
Counterexample
For each integer , let and let be the identity function . Each lies in because is bounded.
If , then , so the family is compatible on the open cover .
Any glued section on would have to equal the identity function , because it agrees with each on . But is not bounded on , so it does not lie in . This violates the gluing requirement in [L1]. Therefore the stated presheaf is not a sheaf.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Sheaves on Spaces, Example 7.6 (standard reference, not scraped)