How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ramified frobenius has no canonical lift
Statement refuted
The residue Frobenius congruence does not determine a unique element of D at a ramified prime. At 2 in , with , one has and . Identity and complex conjugation are distinct lifts of the same arithmetic Frobenius coset in D/I.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.
Gaussian and eisenstein frobenius: In , an odd prime p splits if and is inert if ; arithmetic Frobenius sends . The prime 2 ramifies. In , a prime splits if and is inert if ; arithmetic Frobenius sends . The prime 3 ramifies.
Arithmetic frobenius coset: For finite Galois L/K and nonzero , the arithmetic Frobenius coset is the unique element of corresponding under the residue isomorphism to on , where . It is defined also when P is ramified. Its inverse is called geometric Frobenius. The quotient element is distinguished; a representative in D need not be unique.
Counterexample
The Gaussian calculation gives and residue field F2. There is only one prime above 2, so both automorphisms stabilize it. Modulo P, i=-1=1, and conjugation also sends i to -i=1. As every integral element is a+bi, both automorphisms act identically on every residue.
Thus D=I=C2 and D/I is trivial. The arithmetic map on F2 is x squared, which is identity on its two elements 0 and 1. Both identity and conjugation satisfy its congruence, but they differ on i in the number field. This refutes uniqueness from residue data; it does not preclude an additional external convention from selecting a representative.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- §9.3.2 and §9.4, unramified qualification (standard reference, not scraped)