Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Decomposition groups in a tower

Example

Let M=Q(ζ5), L=Q(5), and K=Q. At p=2 there is a unique prime in each field above p. All ramification indices are one, and the residue degrees are four in M/K and two in each step. The decomposition sequence is 1⟶C2⟶C4⟶C2⟶1, and all inertia groups are trivial. The relative Frobenius for M/L is the square of the Frobenius for M/K.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.

[F1]

Frobenius in a small cyclotomic field: Let ζ=ζ5 be a primitive fifth root of unity and L=Q(ζ). Then Gal⁡(L/Q)≅(Z/5Z)×=C4 by σa(ζ)=ζa. For every prime p≠5, p is unramified and its arithmetic Frobenius is σp mod 5. In particular 2 is inert, with (e,f,g)=(1,4,1).

[F2]

Decomposition and inertia in towers: Let M/L/K be a tower of number fields with M/K and L/K finite Galois, and fix nonzero primes Q∣P∣p. With H=Gal⁡(M/L), D(Q/P)=D(Q/p)∩H,I(Q/P)=I(Q/p)∩H. Restriction gives exact sequences 1→D(Q/P)→D(Q/p)→D(P/p)→1, 1→I(Q/P)→I(Q/p)→I(P/p)→1. The intersection identities also hold without L/K Galois; the displayed quotient assertions use that hypothesis.

[F3]

Frobenius compatibility in finite towers: Let M/L/K have M/K and L/K finite Galois, and let Q∣P∣p be nonzero primes with Q unramified over p. Then Frob⁡(Q/p)∣L=Frob⁡(P/p),Frob⁡(Q/P)=Frob⁡(Q/p)f(P/p). If M=L1L2 with both Li/K finite Galois and Q unramified over p, the Frobenius elements at its two contractions determine Frob⁡(Q/p) uniquely by restriction.

Verification

1.1F1algebra

Put t=ζ5+ζ5−1. Expanding and using 1+ζ5+⋯+ζ54=0 gives t2+t−1=0. This polynomial has discriminant 5, not a rational square, so Q(t)=Q(5) has degree two. Exponent 2 sends t to ζ52+ζ5−2=−1−t≠t, while exponent 4 fixes t. Thus restriction has kernel the order-two subgroup generated by exponent 4.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

At 2, M/K is unramified and inert with degree four, so there is one prime Q, D(Q/p)=C4 and I(Q/p)=1. Every prime of L above p has a prime of M above it by integral prime factorization, so it is the contraction P of Q. The tower exact sequences now give D(Q/P)=C2 and D(P/p)=C2 with all inertia groups trivial. In the unramified residue isomorphisms these group orders are the residue degrees, giving two in each step.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1∎

Compatibility says that the absolute exponent-2 Frobenius restricts to the nonidentity automorphism of L, and the relative Frobenius is its f(P/p)=2 power, namely exponent 4. This realizes the displayed exact sequence.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources