Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The braid category is braided but not symmetric

Statement refuted

Every braided monoidal category is symmetric.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The braid category B.

[L1]

The braid category is braided monoidal by construction (The braid category).

[L2]

The group B2 is infinite cyclic, generated by σ1 (The two-strand braid group is infinite cyclic).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenL1algebra

By [L1], B is a braided monoidal category. Its braiding on the generating object 1⊗1=2 is the crossing braid σ1∈B2.

2.1L2step 1.1algebra

By [L2], σ1 has infinite order, so in particular σ12≠12. Therefore the square of the braiding on 1⊗1 is not the identity.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

A symmetric braiding must square to the identity on every tensor product. Step 2.1 shows that this fails in B, so B is braided but not symmetric.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources