How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The braid category is braided but not symmetric
Statement refuted
Every braided monoidal category is symmetric.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The braid category .
The braid category is braided monoidal by construction (The braid category).
The group is infinite cyclic, generated by (The two-strand braid group is infinite cyclic).
Counterexample
By [L1], is a braided monoidal category. Its braiding on the generating object is the crossing braid .
By [L2], has infinite order, so in particular . Therefore the square of the braiding on is not the identity.
A symmetric braiding must square to the identity on every tensor product. Step 2.1 shows that this fails in , so is braided but not symmetric.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael Muger, Tensor Categories: A Selective Guided Tour, Section 4 (standard reference, not scraped)