How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
There is no field with six elements
Statement refuted
There exists a field with six elements.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A hypothetical field with .
Every finite field has order for a prime and a positive integer (Every finite field has order for a unique prime characteristic and positive integer ).
A prime greater than has no nontrivial factorization (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ).
If a prime divides a product, it divides one of the factors (Euclid's lemma: if is prime and then or ).
Counterexample
Suppose, for contradiction, that exists. By [L1], for some prime and .
The prime divides , so [L3] gives or , and [L2] forces or . But no positive power of is , and no positive power of is : at exponent one the values are and , while at exponent at least two they are divisible by or .
This contradiction proves that no six-element field exists.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Finite Fields, Section 1 (standard reference, not scraped)