How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: is the ring
Statement
For every prime and positive integer , the finite field is the quotient ring .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The case , .
A field with four elements exists (For every prime and , a field with elements exists).
The congruence-class ring is the quotient ring (For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
In a field every nonzero element has an inverse, so a nonzero nilpotent cannot exist (Field).
Refutation
By [L1], is a field. In , the class is nonzero but .
Thus has a nonzero nilpotent and is not a field by [L3], so it cannot be isomorphic to .
This single case refutes the universal identification. Equal cardinality does not determine a ring structure.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 53 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Finite Fields, Remarks 1.9 and 2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)