How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equivalent higher extensions need not have one middle-term isomorphism
Statement refuted
Give a zigzag of endpoint-identity chain maps between two two-fold extensions whose middle-object shapes prevent a single isomorphism, illustrating the generated equivalence relation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: in abelian groups and the two two-fold extensions below.
Counterexample
Let be , and let be , where the left inclusion is . Both are exact.
The maps and give an endpoint-identity chain map , while the coordinate projections give one . Thus the two extensions are equivalent in the generated sense. But their first middle terms are and , which are not isomorphic, so no single middle-term isomorphism can witness this equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapters 3–4 (standard reference, not scraped)