Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

8 results · all verified · 7 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This draft develops extensions, Baer addition, the Yoneda product, and homological dimensions. It retains the convention that an extension of M by N has quotient M and subobject N.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The split extension as the zero Baer class

Example

Compute the Baer sum of a split extension with an arbitrary extension and exhibit the induced equivalence with the original representative.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An extension e:0NiEpM0 and the split extension s:0NNMM0.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The pullback of es along Δ:MMM is canonically EN: the morphism (1E,1Np):ENE(NM) exhibits the pullback. Under this identification its kernel map is (a,b)(i(a),b) from NN.

givenconstruct
2.1

The morphism (1E,i):ENE agrees on that kernel with i:NNE. Hence the universal property of the pushout along gives a morphism from the Baer-sum middle object to E that is the identity on both endpoints. A morphism of short exact sequences that is the identity on the endpoints is an isomorphism, so the sum is equivalent to e. Thus the split class is zero without using elements or module quotients.

step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Baer sum of two extensions of cyclic groups

Example

The Baer sum of two copies of the nonsplit extension e:0Z/2a2aZ/4xxmod2Z/20 is split. Thus [e]+[e]=0 among extension classes of Z/2 by Z/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two copies of e displayed above. All groups and maps in the calculation are abelian.

[F1]

Baer sum is diagonal pullback followed by codiagonal pushout: The Baer sum of extension classes.

[F2]

The split class The split extension class is the additive zero whenever extension classes form a set, by Baer sum makes extension classes an abelian group.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Any middle group in an extension of Z/2 by Z/2 has four elements. Transporting its law and endpoint maps to a fixed four-element set shows that the classes have a finite set realization. The extension e is nonsplit because every element of Z/4 above 1Z/2 has order four.

givenalgebra
1.2

The diagonal pullback has middle group D={(x,y)(Z/4)2:xy(mod2)} and kernel map (a,b)(2a,2b). Its codiagonal pushout is E=(DZ/2)/L, where L={((2a,2b),(a+b)):a,bZ/2}. The endpoint maps are j(c)=[((0,0),c)] and q([((x,y),c)])=xmod2.

F1givenconstruct
2.1

The map j is injective since a relation with first component (0,0) has a=b=0. If q([((x,y),c)])=0, write x=2a,y=2b; its class equals j(c+a+b). Thus kerq=imj, and q is surjective. The class t=[((1,1),0)] has q(t)=1 and 2t=[((2,2),0)]=0, the relation for a=b=1.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

Therefore s(1)=t defines a homomorphic section of q. The map (c,b)j(c)+s(b) is an endpoint-preserving isomorphism (Z/2)2E: surjectivity and injectivity follow from the kernel description and qs=1. Hence the Baer sum is split and equals the zero class.

F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Ext one of Z modulo n by an abelian group as extension classes

Example

Combine the cyclic Ext calculation with the Yoneda Ext-one theorem to interpret A/nA as equivalence classes of extensions of Z/n by A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An abelian group A, n2, and an element aA.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Put Ea=(AZ)/(a,n). The maps AEa, x[(x,0)], and EaZ/nZ, [(x,k)][k], give an exact sequence 0AEaZ/nZ0.

givenconstruct
2.1

Replacing a by a+nb gives an equivalent extension by changing the lift of 1modn by the image of bA. Conversely the connecting class is the residue of a modulo nA. Thus the derived/Yoneda correspondence identifies A/nA with these extension classes.

step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Splicing two short exact sequences

Example

Concatenate two displayed short exact sequences with common middle endpoint and identify the resulting two-fold extension and its derived Ext product.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Short exact sequences 0NEuL0 and 0LvFM0.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Concatenating the maps gives 0NEvuFM0. Its exactness at E follows from v monic and keru=N. At F, im(vu)=v(imu)=v(L), which is exactly the kernel of FM.

givenconstruct
2.1

This exact five-term sequence is the two-fold Yoneda extension obtained by splicing. Under the comparison with derived Ext, its class is the composition of the classes of the two displayed short exact sequences in Ext2(M,N).

step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A noncommutative Yoneda product

Example

Use a finite-dimensional algebra with composable nonsymmetric extension classes to calculate two products in opposite orders and show they differ or one is undefined by endpoints.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, R=kx,y/(x,y)2, and the simple left R-module S=R/(x,y).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Let V=(x,y), so V2=0. The free resolution Pn=RkVn with differential given by multiplication by the first V-factor has kerdn=VkVn=imdn+1. Applying HomR(,S) gives zero differentials, so ExtRn(S,S)(V)n. Let u,v be the dual basis classes in degree one.

givenconstruct
2.1

Yoneda splicing corresponds to concatenating tensors under this resolution. Consequently uv and vu are distinct basis vectors of (V)2=ExtR2(S,S). Both products are typed in the same self-Ext algebra, and they differ; this is a genuinely noncommutative Yoneda product.

step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Projective dimension of a cyclic abelian group

Example

Use 0 -> Z --n--> Z -> Z/n -> 0 and the nonzero Ext^1 calculation to prove that Z/n has projective dimension one over Z.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M=Z/nZ for an integer n2.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The exact sequence 0ZnZM0 is a projective resolution of length one, so pdZM1.

givenconstruct
2.1

Applying HomZ(,Z) gives ExtZ1(M,Z)Z/nZ0. The higher-Ext criterion therefore rules out projective dimension zero, so pdZM=1.

step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Global dimension of a field and of the integers

Example

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every vector space is free, giving global dimension zero for a field; pair the cyclic-group witness with the subgroup-freeness argument for global dimension one of Z.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and the ring Z, under Choice.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Every k-module is a vector space and has a basis, hence is free and projective. Therefore every module has projective dimension zero and gl.dimk=0.

givenconstruct
2.1

For every abelian group A, a free presentation has free kernel, so pdZA1 by The integers have global dimension one. The concrete nonzero group ExtZ1(Z/2,Z)Z/2 supplies a degree-one witness. Hence gl.dimZ=1.

step 1.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Equivalent higher extensions need not have one middle-term isomorphism

Statement refuted

Give a zigzag of endpoint-identity chain maps between two two-fold extensions whose middle-object shapes prevent a single isomorphism, illustrating the generated equivalence relation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M=N=Z in abelian groups and the two two-fold extensions below.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Let E be 0Z1Z0Z1Z0, and let E be 0ZZ2(a,c)(0,c)Z2(b,c)bZ0, where the left inclusion is a(a,0). Both are exact.

givenconstruct
2.1

The maps (a)(a,0) and (b)(b,0) give an endpoint-identity chain map EE, while the coordinate projections give one EE. Thus the two extensions are equivalent in the generated sense. But their first middle terms are Z and Z2, which are not isomorphic, so no single middle-term isomorphism can witness this equivalence.

step 1.1algebra

Sources