Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 8 results · all verified · 7 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This draft develops extensions, Baer addition, the Yoneda product, and homological dimensions. It retains the convention that an extension of M by N has quotient M and subobject N.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

The split extension as the zero Baer class

Example

Compute the Baer sum of a split extension with an arbitrary extension and exhibit the induced equivalence with the original representative.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An extension e:0→N→iE→pM→0 and the split extension s:0→N→N⊕M→M→0.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

The pullback of e⊕s along Δ:M→M⊕M is canonically E⊕N: the morphism (1E, 1N⊕p):E⊕N→E⊕(N⊕M) exhibits the pullback. Under this identification its kernel map is (a,b)↦(i(a),b) from N⊕N.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The morphism (1E,i):E⊕N→E agrees on that kernel with i∘∇:N⊕N→E. Hence the universal property of the pushout along ∇ gives a morphism from the Baer-sum middle object to E that is the identity on both endpoints. A morphism of short exact sequences that is the identity on the endpoints is an isomorphism, so the sum is equivalent to e. Thus the split class is zero without using elements or module quotients.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Baer sum of two extensions of cyclic groups

Example

The Baer sum of two copies of the nonsplit extension e:0⟶Z/2→a↦2aZ/4→x↦x mod 2Z/2⟶0 is split. Thus [e]+[e]=0 among extension classes of Z/2 by Z/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two copies of e displayed above. All groups and maps in the calculation are abelian.

[F1]

Baer sum is diagonal pullback followed by codiagonal pushout: The Baer sum of extension classes.

[F2]

The split class The split extension class is the additive zero whenever extension classes form a set, by Baer sum makes extension classes an abelian group.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Any middle group in an extension of Z/2 by Z/2 has four elements. Transporting its law and endpoint maps to a fixed four-element set shows that the classes have a finite set realization. The extension e is nonsplit because every element of Z/4 above 1∈Z/2 has order four.

1.2F1givenconstruct

The diagonal pullback has middle group D={(x,y)∈(Z/4)2:x≡y(mod2)} and kernel map (a,b)↦(2a,2b). Its codiagonal pushout is E=(D⊕Z/2)/L, where L={((2a,2b),−(a+b)):a,b∈Z/2}. The endpoint maps are j(c)=[((0,0),c)] and q([((x,y),c)])=x mod 2.

2.1step 1.2algebra

The map j is injective since a relation with first component (0,0) has a=b=0. If q([((x,y),c)])=0, write x=2a,y=2b; its class equals j(c+a+b). Thus ker⁡q=im⁡j, and q is surjective. The class t=[((1,−1),0)] has q(t)=1 and 2t=[((2,2),0)]=0, the relation for a=b=1.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Therefore s(1)=t defines a homomorphic section of q. The map (c,b)↦j(c)+s(b) is an endpoint-preserving isomorphism (Z/2)2→E: surjectivity and injectivity follow from the kernel description and qs=1. Hence the Baer sum is split and equals the zero class.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Ext one of Z modulo n by an abelian group as extension classes

Example

Combine the cyclic Ext calculation with the Yoneda Ext-one theorem to interpret A/nA as equivalence classes of extensions of Z/n by A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An abelian group A, n≥2, and an element a∈A.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

Put Ea=(A⊕Z)/⟨(a,−n)⟩. The maps A→Ea, x↦[(x,0)], and Ea→Z/nZ, [(x,k)]↦[k], give an exact sequence 0→A→Ea→Z/nZ→0.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Replacing a by a+nb gives an equivalent extension by changing the lift of 1 mod n by the image of b∈A. Conversely the connecting class is the residue of a modulo nA. Thus the derived/Yoneda correspondence identifies A/nA with these extension classes.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Splicing two short exact sequences

Example

Concatenate two displayed short exact sequences with common middle endpoint and identify the resulting two-fold extension and its derived Ext product.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Short exact sequences 0→N→E→uL→0 and 0→L→vF→M→0.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

Concatenating the maps gives 0→N→E→vuF→M→0. Its exactness at E follows from v monic and ker⁡u=N. At F, im⁡(vu)=v(im⁡u)=v(L), which is exactly the kernel of F→M.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

This exact five-term sequence is the two-fold Yoneda extension obtained by splicing. Under the comparison with derived Ext, its class is the composition of the classes of the two displayed short exact sequences in Ext⁡2(M,N).

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

A noncommutative Yoneda product

Example

Use a finite-dimensional algebra with composable nonsymmetric extension classes to calculate two products in opposite orders and show they differ or one is undefined by endpoints.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, R=k⟨x,y⟩/(x,y)2, and the simple left R-module S=R/(x,y).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

Let V=(x,y), so V2=0. The free resolution Pn=R⊗kV⊗n with differential given by multiplication by the first V-factor has ker⁡dn=V⊗kV⊗n=im⁡dn+1. Applying Hom⁡R(−,S) gives zero differentials, so Ext⁡Rn(S,S)≅(V∗)⊗n. Let u,v be the dual basis classes in degree one.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Yoneda splicing corresponds to concatenating tensors under this resolution. Consequently uv and vu are distinct basis vectors of (V∗)⊗2=Ext⁡R2(S,S). Both products are typed in the same self-Ext algebra, and they differ; this is a genuinely noncommutative Yoneda product.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Projective dimension of a cyclic abelian group

Example

Use 0 -> Z --n--> Z -> Z/n -> 0 and the nonzero Ext^1 calculation to prove that Z/n has projective dimension one over Z.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M=Z/nZ for an integer n≥2.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

The exact sequence 0→Z→nZ→M→0 is a projective resolution of length one, so pd⁡ZM≤1.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Applying Hom⁡Z(−,Z) gives Ext⁡Z1(M,Z)≅Z/nZ≠0. The higher-Ext criterion therefore rules out projective dimension zero, so pd⁡ZM=1.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Global dimension of a field and of the integers

Example

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every vector space is free, giving global dimension zero for a field; pair the cyclic-group witness with the subgroup-freeness argument for global dimension one of Z.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and the ring Z, under Choice.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

Every k-module is a vector space and has a basis, hence is free and projective. Therefore every module has projective dimension zero and gl.dim⁡k=0.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

For every abelian group A, a free presentation has free kernel, so pd⁡ZA≤1 by The integers have global dimension one. The concrete nonzero group Ext⁡Z1(Z/2,Z)≅Z/2 supplies a degree-one witness. Hence gl.dim⁡Z=1.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Equivalent higher extensions need not have one middle-term isomorphism

Statement refuted

Give a zigzag of endpoint-identity chain maps between two two-fold extensions whose middle-object shapes prevent a single isomorphism, illustrating the generated equivalence relation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M=N=Z in abelian groups and the two two-fold extensions below.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenconstruct

Let E be 0→Z→1Z→0Z→1Z→0, and let E′ be 0→Z→Z2→(a,c)↦(0,c)Z2→(b,c)↦bZ→0, where the left inclusion is a↦(a,0). Both are exact.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The maps (a)↦(a,0) and (b)↦(b,0) give an endpoint-identity chain map E→E′, while the coordinate projections give one E′→E. Thus the two extensions are equivalent in the generated sense. But their first middle terms are Z and Z2, which are not isomorphic, so no single middle-term isomorphism can witness this equivalence.

Sources