How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Set Theory Beyond Choice: Recorded, Not Proved Here
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
2 · Summary
This draft develops extensions, Baer addition, the Yoneda product, and homological dimensions. It retains the convention that an extension of by has quotient and subobject .
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The split extension as the zero Baer class
Example
Compute the Baer sum of a split extension with an arbitrary extension and exhibit the induced equivalence with the original representative.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An extension and the split extension .
Verification
The pullback of along is canonically : the morphism exhibits the pullback. Under this identification its kernel map is from .
The morphism agrees on that kernel with . Hence the universal property of the pushout along gives a morphism from the Baer-sum middle object to that is the identity on both endpoints. A morphism of short exact sequences that is the identity on the endpoints is an isomorphism, so the sum is equivalent to . Thus the split class is zero without using elements or module quotients.
Baer sum of two extensions of cyclic groups
Example
The Baer sum of two copies of the nonsplit extension is split. Thus among extension classes of by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two copies of displayed above. All groups and maps in the calculation are abelian.
Baer sum is diagonal pullback followed by codiagonal pushout: The Baer sum of extension classes.
The split class The split extension class is the additive zero whenever extension classes form a set, by Baer sum makes extension classes an abelian group.
Verification
Any middle group in an extension of by has four elements. Transporting its law and endpoint maps to a fixed four-element set shows that the classes have a finite set realization. The extension is nonsplit because every element of above has order four.
The diagonal pullback has middle group and kernel map . Its codiagonal pushout is , where . The endpoint maps are and .
The map is injective since a relation with first component has . If , write ; its class equals . Thus , and is surjective. The class has and , the relation for .
Therefore defines a homomorphic section of . The map is an endpoint-preserving isomorphism : surjectivity and injectivity follow from the kernel description and . Hence the Baer sum is split and equals the zero class.
Ext one of Z modulo n by an abelian group as extension classes
Example
Combine the cyclic Ext calculation with the Yoneda Ext-one theorem to interpret A/nA as equivalence classes of extensions of Z/n by A.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An abelian group , , and an element .
Verification
Put . The maps , , and , , give an exact sequence .
Replacing by gives an equivalent extension by changing the lift of by the image of . Conversely the connecting class is the residue of modulo . Thus the derived/Yoneda correspondence identifies with these extension classes.
Splicing two short exact sequences
Example
Concatenate two displayed short exact sequences with common middle endpoint and identify the resulting two-fold extension and its derived Ext product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Short exact sequences and .
Verification
Concatenating the maps gives . Its exactness at follows from monic and . At , , which is exactly the kernel of .
This exact five-term sequence is the two-fold Yoneda extension obtained by splicing. Under the comparison with derived Ext, its class is the composition of the classes of the two displayed short exact sequences in .
A noncommutative Yoneda product
Example
Use a finite-dimensional algebra with composable nonsymmetric extension classes to calculate two products in opposite orders and show they differ or one is undefined by endpoints.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , , and the simple left -module .
Verification
Let , so . The free resolution with differential given by multiplication by the first -factor has . Applying gives zero differentials, so . Let be the dual basis classes in degree one.
Yoneda splicing corresponds to concatenating tensors under this resolution. Consequently and are distinct basis vectors of . Both products are typed in the same self-Ext algebra, and they differ; this is a genuinely noncommutative Yoneda product.
Projective dimension of a cyclic abelian group
Example
Use 0 -> Z --n--> Z -> Z/n -> 0 and the nonzero Ext^1 calculation to prove that Z/n has projective dimension one over Z.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: for an integer .
Verification
The exact sequence is a projective resolution of length one, so .
Applying gives . The higher-Ext criterion therefore rules out projective dimension zero, so .
Global dimension of a field and of the integers
Example
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every vector space is free, giving global dimension zero for a field; pair the cyclic-group witness with the subgroup-freeness argument for global dimension one of Z.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and the ring , under Choice.
Verification
Every -module is a vector space and has a basis, hence is free and projective. Therefore every module has projective dimension zero and .
For every abelian group , a free presentation has free kernel, so by The integers have global dimension one. The concrete nonzero group supplies a degree-one witness. Hence .
Equivalent higher extensions need not have one middle-term isomorphism
Statement refuted
Give a zigzag of endpoint-identity chain maps between two two-fold extensions whose middle-object shapes prevent a single isomorphism, illustrating the generated equivalence relation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: in abelian groups and the two two-fold extensions below.
Counterexample
Let be , and let be , where the left inclusion is . Both are exact.
The maps and give an endpoint-identity chain map , while the coordinate projections give one . Thus the two extensions are equivalent in the generated sense. But their first middle terms are and , which are not isomorphic, so no single middle-term isomorphism can witness this equivalence.