Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two L2 functions can have convolution outside L2

Statement refuted

Every convolution of two L2(R) functions again belongs to L2(R).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-dimensional function f(x)=g(x):=(1+∣x∣)−3/4.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Since [given, algebra] ∫R(1+∣x∣)−3/2 dx<∞, the functions f and g lie in L2(R).

2.1step 1.1algebra

For each fixed x, the convolution integral is finite: on a bounded y-interval its continuous integrand is bounded, while for ∣y∣>2∣x∣+2 one has 1+∣x−y∣≥(1+∣y∣)/2, so the integrand is at most 23/4(1+∣y∣)−3/2, an integrable tail. For x>2, [step 1.1, algebra] (f∗g)(x)=∫R(1+∣x−y∣)−3/4(1+∣y∣)−3/4 dy≥∫1x−1x−3/4x−3/4 dy=x−2x3/2. So for large x, (f∗g)(x)≥c x−1/2 for some c>0.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

But [step 2.1, algebra] ∫2∞x−1 dx=∞, so the lower bound from step 2.1 shows f∗g∉L2(R). Hence the statement refuted above is false.

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources