How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: if , then is defined for every
Statement
False claim. If , then is defined for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-dimensional functions
The convolution theorem guarantees only almost-everywhere existence (If , then exists almost everywhere, belongs to , and ).
Refutation
The function is integrable near , so [L1, given, algebra] .
At one has [step 1.1, algebra] The single point is irrelevant to Lebesgue integrability, so it is enough to inspect the punctured interval . There the substitution gives and , hence Thus is not defined as an absolutely convergent Lebesgue integral.
Therefore the convolution of two functions need not be defined at [L1, step 2.1] every point; [L1] correctly states only almost-everywhere existence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Walter Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)