How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: translation is continuous in
Statement
False claim. Translation is continuous in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The indicator of the unit interval in one dimension.
The finite- translation theorem excludes ( in as , for ).
Refutation
Let on . For every , the [L1, given, algebra] functions and differ by on a set of positive measure: for , for instance, on one has and .
Therefore [step 1.1, algebra]
for every , so the norm does not tend to as .
Hence translation is not continuous in , which is exactly why [L1, step 2.1] [L1] stops at .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard L. Wheeden and Antoni Zygmund, Measure and Integral: An Introduction to Real Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)