Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unbounded punctured harmonic singularity is not removable

Statement refuted

A harmonic function on a punctured ball need not have a harmonic extension at the puncture without growth control. On 0<∣x∣<1, use u(x)=log⁡∣x∣ for n=2 and u(x)=∣x∣2−n for n≥3. Neither has even a continuous extension at zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement refuted.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

For r=∣x∣>0, differentiating f(r) gives Δf(r)=f′′(r)+(n−1)f′(r)/r. For n=2, f′=1/r and f′′=−1/r2 cancel. For n≥3, f′=(2−n)r1−n and f′′=(2−n)(1−n)r−n also cancel. Thus both profiles are harmonic away from zero.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The logarithm tends to −∞ as r↓0, and the negative power tends to +∞. Continuity at zero would require a finite limit, so no harmonic extension exists. These profiles also violate boundedness near the point. Their signed ratios to the critical growth profiles are −1 for n=2 and 1 for n≥3, so in both cases the absolute ratio is one rather than tending to zero.

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources