How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unbounded punctured harmonic singularity is not removable
Statement refuted
A harmonic function on a punctured ball need not have a harmonic extension at the puncture without growth control. On , use for and for . Neither has even a continuous extension at zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement refuted.
Counterexample
For , differentiating gives . For , and cancel. For , and also cancel. Thus both profiles are harmonic away from zero.
The logarithm tends to as , and the negative power tends to . Continuity at zero would require a finite limit, so no harmonic extension exists. These profiles also violate boundedness near the point. Their signed ratios to the critical growth profiles are for and for , so in both cases the absolute ratio is one rather than tending to zero.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Gantumur, Harmonic functions (standard reference, not scraped)