Alphabeta Math

Maximum Principles Harnack and Liouville in Rn — Examples

About this page
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 1 result · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Items

Example

Harmonic function attaining only boundary extrema

Example

Harnack constant from the Poisson kernel ratio under Countable Choice

Counterexample

Maximum principle fails for superharmonic maxima

Counterexample

Weak maximum principle needs boundedness or control at infinity

Counterexample

Hopf lemma needs a boundary geometry hypothesis

Counterexample

Liouville needs one sided boundedness

Counterexample

Unbounded punctured harmonic singularity is not removable

Counterexample

Strong maximum principle needs connectedness

Counterexample

Hopf conclusion needs a strict nonconstant extremum

Example

Subharmonic quartic and harmonic saddle

Sources